Local Council Performance Fair at best

Assessment of performance rates Hounslow as "fair" and Ealing fails to obtain High Court injunction to suppress publication of their "weak" assessment

The Audit Commission has released the results of a country-wide assessment for the performance of Council's this week. Neither of the Councils that cover the Chiswick area were rated in the top half and Ealing Borough Council was rated "weak" overall. The results came out on the day the voters of the Ealing borough were deciding whether to switch to an elected Mayoral system.

Ealing made a last minute bid to prevent the report being published but the judge threw out their plea saying it was in the interest of local people to see the full report. The Audit Commission expressed disappointment that they were challenged in this way. Ealing are arguing that last minute changes in the report meant that their rating fell from "fair" to weak.

Hounslow "The Council is clear about what it is trying to achieve, and provides a range of effective services for local people, including education, housing and libraries and leisure, coupled with strong financial control. "

Ealing "The Council provides very mixed quality local services. Environmental, social care, benefits administration, housing and resource management all need to improve."

Audit Commissions conclusions on our local councils

Hounslow missed being rated narrowly missed a better rating in the Audit Commission’s Comprehensive Performance Assessment (CPA). With an overall score of 37, Hounslow is classed as a ‘fair’ authority, and was just one point short of the 38 points required for ‘good’. 35% of Councils received a "good" rating, with 15% achieving an "excellent" rating including Hammersmith and Fulham and Wandsworth.

The CPA's overall assessment of Hounslow was, "the Council is clear about what it is trying to achieve, and provides a range of effective services for local people, including education, housing and libraries and leisure, coupled with strong financial control. "

The report also noted that “Hounslow has effective consultative and intelligence gathering systems to identify user and local community views, particularly within services."

For Ealing it said, "The Council provides very mixed quality local services. Environmental, social care, benefits administration, housing and resource management all need to improve."

Both councils received a low rating for environmental services.

The government sees the CPA as an important step in its drive to improve the effectiveness of local government and the Audit Commission have made assessments of every Council in the country.

Cllr John Chatt, Leader of Hounslow Council said: “We are delighted that so many of our achievements have been recognised, but it is obviously a disappointment that we have been pipped at the post by just one point. As this assessment shows, we have ambitious plans to make Hounslow a borough where everyone is proud to live and work. We see this first CPA as an important step on the way to making the changes necessary to achieve that."

Leader of Ealing Council, Cllr John Cudmore, said:"We do not accept this verdict and we are pleased that the commission has recognised our concerns and has immediately set about investigating them. Some of the council's achievements commended in the draft report have been removed or modified at the last minute; we are asking the Audit Commission why this has happened."

They are hoping that an Audit Commission investigation will result in a change in their rating.

December 12, 2002

Sign up for our free weekly newsletter

Scorecard for Hounslow

Scorecard for Ealing

Council Tax Rises in both Hounslow and Ealing - 27/3/2002

Does Chiswick pay the highest tax in London?