Garage Developments Approved Despite Councillors' Concerns

New housing to be built off Oxford Road North and Garth Road

Visualisation from planning documents of the planned building at Oxford Court
Visualisation from planning documents of the planned building at Oxford Court

Participate


Plans for Future of Chiswick Terrace Revealed

Council Planning To Redevelop Grove Park Garages

Jamie Theakston's Plan for Garden Outbuilding Rejected

20 Metre Mast Planned Next To Chiswick Old Cemetery

Two Options Presented for 250 Gunnersbury Avenue

Councillors Asked To Rule on Burlington Lane Plan

Council Defends 'Safe and Secure' JC Decaux Ad Display

Sign up for our weekly Chiswick newsletter

Comment on this story on the

A meeting of the borough planning committee this Thursday (30 June) has accepted a recommendation from council planning officers to grant an application to knock down garages on sites owned by the council in Chiswick and build housing.

The green light comes despite a significant number of objections from residents close to both sites and reservations about the schemes from both Labour and Conservative councillors.

The proposal for the site off Oxford Road North at Oxford Court (P/2021/3808) will see 23 garages demolished to be replaced with a three storey residential block with three car parking spaces. The flats, five of which would be one bedroom and four two bedroom, would be affordable housing for rent delivered by a Registered Provider. The application was sent to the planning committee with a recommendation for approval due to 39 people registering an objection.

At the other site at Garth Court (P/2022/0137), which is between Barrowgate Road and the A4, 12 garages will be demolished to make way for two houses. Six local residents objected to the proposal.

Despite voting to approve both schemes, councillors on the planning committee were not happy with the proposals. Newly elected councillor Rhys Williams, who represents a ward in Brentford said, "We want housing, we want good quality housing but we don't want to impact neighbours. We could have had a perfectly acceptable scheme which delivered almost exactly the same number of beds without having the impact on the neighbours. In policy terms it's compliant. We have to judge the application in front of us, not the one we would like though it's always frustrating when this is the point that we say yes or no on a scheme. But as a Borough I'd say we can do slightly better in future, getting the quality right for future neighbours as well as existing ones."

Cllr Tony Louki said that it was 'quite shocking' to hear from the applicants how amenity had been reduced on the site.

Visualisation of the two new houses at Garth Court from the planning application
Visualisation of the two new houses at Garth Court from the planning application

Speaking at the planning committee, Chiswick Gunnersbury ward councillor Joanna Biddolph compared the application with the original scheme put forward by the developer, "This new proposal compared with the original increases the number of people who could live here by two – only by two – yet because of its size, its scale, its mass, its height, its closeness to other homes, its location on the plot – it is vast and imposing, not in scale. It is far larger and far more overbearing than the original proposal. The proportions – the building, the number of people who could live here, the need we have for residents – aren’t right.

"There is no need for this massive block to be the shape, size and height it is, or in the place it is on this plot, to achieve homes for 20 people. There is no need for it to be crammed up against a boundary wall denying light to its nearest neighbours.

"The stark fact is that the original proposal would provide homes for only two fewer people in a configuration more suited to the plot and to people who are waiting longest on our housing register for a decent amount of space. I urge you to refuse this application and ask Habinteg to refine its original proposal, working with residents to ensure that any development on this plot works for all. Surely developers – and the planning committee – would prefer an outcome that works for all?”

The schemes are part of a broader project across the borough in which the council has identified small plots of lands which it owns for development. Most of these sites currently are occupied by garages with many in Chiswick.

 

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.

July 9, 2022

 

Bookmark and Share