"Heathrow Won’t Stop At Third Runway"

2M Group warn that third runway would inevitably lead to demands for a fourth

Related Links

A sad day for Putney - comments from the forum

PM Sent Videos Supporting Justine Greening MP

"Politicians Must Stand Firm On No Third Runway At Heathrow"

U-Turn On Third Runway Would Lose Tories Votes, Says Poll

Open Letter From 2M To The Aviation Lobby

Do-it-Yourself Noise Challenge to BAA

Trial By Noise

Measure and share the aircraft noise levels you experience

Download the free WideNoise app for iPhone and Android

Third Runway Plans Scrapped


Sign up for email newsletters from ActonW3.com, BrentfordTW8.com, ChiswickW4.com, EalingToday.co.uk, FulhamSW6.com HammersmithToday.co.uk, PutneySW15.com, ShepherdsBushW12.com, WandsworthSW18.com and WimbledonSW19.com

The all-party campaign alliance, which includes more than 20 councils, explains that the ‘hub’ airport model needs high volumes of short-haul ‘feeder flights’ to attract enough passengers to fill its long haul services.

As the hub adds more long haul routes to its schedule it needs to accommodate even more feeder flights to fill the extra seats.

Both types of flights have to arrive within the same time window so passengers can make swift connections.

This pattern leads to high peaks of demand throughout the day. During these busy periods the airport is under pressure to land very high volumes of planes – leading to demands for additional runway and terminal space.

2M warns that these pressures give hub airports an insatiable appetite for expansion and that BAA’s current bid to reopen the third runway debate would be followed by demands for further additional capacity including the possibility of a fourth runway.

Speaking on behalf of the campaign group, leader of Wandsworth Council Ravi Govindia said: “History shows that the airport has an unquenchable thirst for expansion. A successful hub will always want to grow – but you simply cannot keep adding new runways in this part of the country. It blights the lives of too many people.

“Expanding Heathrow would be the wrong decision on every level. There are better options for improving the UK’s connectivity and as we must now unpick the airport owner’s case which is inevitably based on its own commercial self interest.”

Leader of Hounslow Council and 2M spokesman Jagdish Sharma, said:
“Heathrow is a vital part of our local economy but it needs to be better, not bigger. As community leaders we need to debunk the myths around the absolute need for more runway capacity. In essence it is simple - BAA and the airlines need to make better use of what they have. If the airport grows, the burden for our communities of noise and pollution and pressure on the local road network becomes worse and it is already intolerable.”

Leader of Hammersmith and Fulham Council and 2M spokesman Cllr Nick Botterill said:
“The decision to locate the UK’s main airport at Heathrow was taken over 65 years ago at the end of the Second World War and it is simply now in the wrong place. “A pint sized extra runway at Heathrow would do little to improve Britain’s economic prospects but would allow a big increase in aircraft noise by introducing more flight-paths over our heads.”

The 2M Group is also opposed to any move to bring in more flights by allowing aircraft to use both Heathrow runways in parallel for landings – known as ‘mixed mode’ operations. Currently arriving aircraft switch runways at 3pm each day which provides vital respite for flightpath communities.

The 2M group is an all-party alliance of more than 20 local authorities concerned at the environmental impact of Heathrow expansion on their communities. In 2010 the Group led a successful High Court challenge against the previous Government’s plan to add a third runway.

The group, which took its name from the 2 million residents of the original 12 authorities, now represents a combined population of 5 million people.

September 28, 2012