Councillor Says Survey Shows Nighttime Parking Needed

Contradicts previous report claiming ample capacity in town centre

Cllr Biddolph photographed the car park being full on three consecutive nights
Cllr Biddolph photographed the car park being full on three consecutive nights

Related Links

Survey Claims to Show Ample Parking in Chiswick

Revised Designs for 'Old Market Place' Published

Seven Hundred Lime Bikes Delivered to the Area

Over Fifty Parking Areas for E-bikes To Be Set Up in Chiswick

Threatened Parking Spaces 'Generate £15,000 a Day' for Local Retailers

Council Plan Could See Jeremy Clarkson Paying £1,000 To Park in Chiswick

Fury As Entire Street Gets Parking Tickets

Chiswick High Road Nation's Top for Fines Again

Participate

Sign up for our weekly Chiswick newsletter

Comment on this story on the

February 24, 2024

A Chiswick councillor has conducted a survey of night time use of the car park in the centre of Chiswick in an attempt to counter claims that there is ample spare capacity.

Joanna Biddolph, who represents Chiswick Gunnersbury ward, was responding to an earlier survey of use of the car park which suggested there were nearly always car parking spaces available for shoppers.

This survey was conducted by Benchmark Data Collection, an independent company that has been undertaking traffic surveys for over thirty years and was commissioned by Birchgrove, the developer of the police station, the Flower Market and Hounslow Council.

Proposals for landscaping of the car park area have been drawn up but they would see a significant reduction in the number of spaces.

Cllr Biddolph criticised the survey on the grounds that it did not collect any data after 7pm when she said the demand for parking was highest.

She said, “Assessing parking need on non-peak demand is like removing most of the ski lifts at Val d’Isère because they’re not used in summer.”

The earlier survey only looked at the hours during which parking fees were paid to the council but she says usage tends to rise when charging ends.

Cllr Biddolph says she is lobbied ‘almost daily’ about the importance of car parking availability by Chiswick businesses whose customers need to drive.

As a result, she carried out a second snapshot survey on the evening of Friday 26 January asking users of the car park between 7.50pm and 9.50pm how much they had spent on their visit. An earlier survey she conducted had analysed spending habits during the day.

38 drivers agreed to participate with 15 refusing, 5 said they were just driving through the car park to have a look at the area and five left unable to find a pace.

Cllr Biddolph observed that most cars were occupied by more than one person drivers came from Acton, Barnes, Brentford, Brook Green, Chiswick (mostly Grove Park or Southfields), Ealing, Greenford, Hounslow, Isleworth, Kew, Northfields, north-west London, Richmond, Shepherd’s Bush and Sheen with one from Derby and another from Essex.

She says that by 6.50pm the car park was full with drivers having to wait for a space to become available, a pattern which continued until the end of the survey. When she left the area the car park was full with vehicles still arriving.

It was a very cold but clear evening and there was a comedy night on at the George IV and the pub itself was busy. Cllr Biddolph took photographs of the car park on the two preceding evenings showing that it was also full.

The two highest spends were £260 (food shopping, eating out, cinema tickets) and £150 (food shopping and eating out) and the two lowest spends were £4 (in a betting shop with a pay out of £12) and £1 (on chocolate after an emergency call-out to a store). The drivers surveyed said they had spent a total of £2,556, if the same average spend per car (£67) was assumed for all the vehicles park this would have resulted in a total expenditure of £6,188.

Drivers parked to shop for food and wine, to eat out or to grab a takeaway. One was collecting her teenage daughter from the store where she worked but did not spend here; another parked while seeing her daughter in a show at ArtsEd and did not spend. A delivery driver filled a van with deliveries from a food store to fulfil orders. One driver said they lived near to two Nandos in Hounslow but much preferred the one in Chiswick.

There was a brisk turnaround of motorbike and bike delivery couriers collecting orders from food businesses.

Cllr Biddolph said, “As the survey on a Friday evening showed, the night-time economy is extremely important to Chiswick. As photos taken that evening and on other evenings prove, the car park is similarly full. The car park was also full all day on the fourth Sunday in January when there was no market. All these hours were excluded from the co-commissioned survey. The measure shouldn’t be whether the car park has a value to Hounslow Council from car park charges but the value it has to Chiswick’s retail, hospitality and service economy. The co-commissioned survey was flawed.

“As for directing people to spaces on side roads, which the co-commissioned survey sees as the solution, the Bond Street car park was full throughout the survey time and residents of several nearby roads are petitioning to extend their CPZ hours so spaces will become even scarcer. The fact is that parking must be easy, not a confusing set of signs and directions to out of sight roads which might not have empty spaces. If parking in the central car park is reduced as proposed, it will put off people who want to spend their money here. They will spend it in other retail areas, to Chiswick’s huge disadvantage. Chiswick has been a destination since Roman times. We should celebrate and support that, not deliberately damage its success and survival.”

Hounslow Council’s stated policy is to maintain the overall parking spaces in the borough’s town centres and, if spaces need to be removed, an attempt is made to create new spaces elsewhere. The various Streetspace measures implemented over the last few years have resulted in the suspension of some parking bays but the council says that the overall loss in Chiswick is less that 5%.

Detailed Survey Results

Spend

On what

Where was the driver from

£10

Takeaway

Chiswick

£100

Eating out

Chiswick

£70

Food shopping

Chiswick

£40

Food shopping

Chiswick

£30

Didn’t say

Isleworth

£1

Chocolate

Outside the area

£11

Takeaway supper

Brentford

£150

Food shopping

Chiswick

£30

Takeaway supper

Chiswick

£100

Food shopping

Brook Green

£260

Food shopping, wine shopping, drinks, cinema

Kew (former Chiswick resident)

£60

Food shopping

Southfields

£30

Takeaway supper

Chiswick

£150

Eating out

Chiswick

£100

Food shopping

Acton

£30

Coffee and drinks

Ealing

£40

Eating out

Derby

£150

Eating out, food shopping

Chiswick

£12

Eating out

Chiswick (Blue Badge driver)

£150

Food shopping, eating out

Essex

£32

Food shopping

Chiswick

£100

Eating out

Hounslow

£60

Eating out

Kew

£30

Eating out

Chiswick

£50

Eating out

Northfields

£96

Eating out

Beyond Chiswick

£100

Eating out

Sheen

£100

Eating out

Chiswick

£60

Eating out

Chiswick

£100

Eating out

Brentford

£30

Eating out

Chiswick

£20

Eating out

Barnes

£4

Betting shop (£12 pay out)

Chiswick

£60

Takeaway

Hounslow

£50

Eating out

Ealing

£70

Eating out

Greenford

£50

Eating out

North-west London

£20

Eating out

Shepherd’s Bush

TOTAL SPENT: £2,556

AVERAGE PER CAR £67.26

PLUS 39 CARS PLUS 15 DRIVERS WHO REFUSED = 54 x AVERAGE SPEND PER CAR = £3,632

TOTAL FOR ALL CARS SEEN PARKED (some left, others arrived, overall would be higher): £6,188


Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact info@neighbournet.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.

 


Bookmark and Share