Legal Challenge Made To Temporary Cycleway Scheme

Judicial review applied for by Chiswick residents

Ambulance stuck on Chiswick High Road
Ambulance stuck on Chiswick High Road. Picture: One Chiswick


Have Your Say on Traffic Measures in Chiswick

Ambulance Service Opposed Staveley Road Barrier

Queen Reportedly Gets Stuck in Traffic in Chiswick

Councillor Directs Chiswick Traffic After Signal Failure

Turnham Green Terrace Access Restrictions Suspended

Protestors Hijack Council Transport Chief's Chiswick Visit

Woman Stops Traffic on Turnham Green Terrace

Sign up for our weekly Chiswick newsletter

Comment on this story on the

An application has been made to the High Court for a judicial review of the temporary Cycleway 9 scheme on Chiswick High Road.

It was submitted by two Chiswick residents on Tuesday 10 November and makes the claim that the decision to use Experimental Traffic Orders (ETOs) to implement the scheme was unlawful.

If the application is accepted a judge will look at the case presented by the claimants and can rule that the decision to proceed with the scheme was wrong in law.

The council says it has followed government guidelines in implementing the scheme and points out that it had to submit a bid to Transport for London to obtain a grant to initiate the work. It believes the temporary cycleway will encourage more sustainable means of transport in Chiswick.

The application is being brought by Asal Shirazi BEM, a mother of five who suffers from autoimmune disease, and Mike Ormrod who runs Ormrod Lighting and Electrical shop on Chiswick High Road.

It is being asserted that Hounslow Council acted unlawfully in not complying with the Equalities Act 2010, the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Department for Transport guidance set out in Grant Shapps’ letter to councillors of 16 October.

The Minister stated, “I want to be absolutely clear; we are not prepared to tolerate hastily introduced schemes which will create sweeping changes to communities without consultations, and ones where the benefits of cycling and walking do not outweigh the dis-benefits for other road users.”

It is also claimed that the Council did not issue the ETOs authorising the C9 works until five weeks after construction started, leaving local residents, traders and business owners with no time to challenge the orders.

Although no formal consultation is required for an ETO there should be a seven day notification period before the commencement of any works.

It is further claimed that there has been inadequate consultation with the emergency services. There have been an increased number of reports of ambulances being stuck in traffic on Chiswick High Road with blue lights on since the beginning of construction work on the cycleway scheme.

A spokesman for OneChiswick, a group of Chiswick residents, shopkeepers and business people who oppose the changes said, “Hounslow Council is destroying Chiswick. It is misusing the ETOs permitted under emergency Covid legislation to implement road changes, including Cycleway C9, which are severely impacting on the whole of Chiswick. The changes are preventing people who are old, pregnant or with a disability from accessing health and social services, going to the shops or being visited by care workers. They are also critically impeding emergency vehicle access. They are devastating Chiswick businesses by making journeys so long and gridlocked that trade customers are going elsewhere, and by removing parking – forcing shoppers to shop out of town and out of borough where they can park more easily. And they are forcing drivers on long detours and into less road space causing increased congestion and pollution.

"The ill-thought out and unsafe design of C9 is having a devastating effect on, in particular, parents with young children in buggies, older people and others who are less able or slower to walk. Crossing junctions and roads, where safe haven refuge islands have been removed, are now dangerous activities. Worse, bus passengers are now deposited on floating bus islands stranded in the middle of the road, with a two-way cycle path on one side. We do not believe Hounslow Council carried out a proper safety audit on the C9 scheme. It is unsafe and it is likely that pedestrians, cyclists or other road users will be injured.”

Cllr Hanif Khan, Cabinet Member for Transport and One Hounslow, said, "We have made clear our genuine commitment to listening to all voices, and to an independent review process, so it would be very disappointing if anyone felt this was a course of action they needed to take, especially before any decisions have even been made. That said, we have not yet received service of any legal proceedings."

To have your say on any of Hounslow’s trial Streetspace schemes click on this link or email the transport team on

Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.


November 11, 2020

Bookmark and Share