Move To 'Stop Up' of Essex Place Angers CHRAG

High Road Action group opposes Lend Lease development

Related Links

Simon Kverndal

'Empire House' Challenge Postponed Until September

Good Turnout For Meeting On Empire House

The Future Of Chiswick?

Judicial Review On Empire House Moves A Step Closer

Hounslow Council Responds On Empire House

Locals To Back Challenge To Empire House Development

Empire House Development Gets the Green Light

Sainsbury's To Oppose Lend Lease Development

New Chiswick Development Would Be 'Too High' Say Local Groups

Local Group Response To High Road Development

Major Development Planned For Chiswick High Road

Massive Development Plan For Sainsbury's


Sign up for our free weekly newsletter

Comment on this story on the

The proposal to apply for a temporary 'stopping up' of Essex Place, so that work on the Lend Lease development can go ahead has angered one of the local groups who oppose the project. The procedure would close off the area to pedestrians while building work goes ahead.

Lend Lease has confirmed that the area in question does not include the market stalls, but the High Road Action group is particularly opposed to the stopping up going ahead while the legal challenge to the project is due to be heard in the High Court this month.

"CHRAG strongly objects to the stopping up of Essex Place. This means public rights of access are extinguished. Lendlease has not paid for this land, and the fact that it claims to require the "stopping up" in order to proceed with its controversial development (which is being challenged in court later this month) is not sufficient reason to permit this.

"Not only will Lendlease not be improving the public realm as it claimed, but will in fact be appropriating it. By permitting this, London Borough of Hounslow is not only selling off publicly owned land - it is giving it away for nothing."

The issue is to be discussed at the Chiswick Area Forum on Tuesday, September 8th.

A challenge brought by local resident Simon Kverndal QC against the Lend Lease development of Empire House and Essex place is expected to be heard later this month in the High Court.

Mr Kverndal and his supporters are seeking permission for a judicial review of Hounslow Council’s granting of planning permission to the development. The claim is that the decision was unlawful because of the failure of Officers to properly consult and their failure to take into account and apply important local planning policies.

The development consists of 72 residential units, including affordable homes, in Essex Place and Acton Lane. The Empire House tower block is currently being refurbished from office to residential, on sale as The Opus Collection, with new retail frontage of seven units planned below.

The Judicial Review application being taken by Simon Kverndal QC, is supported by local lawyers and four residents’ groups, challenging the legality of the planning decision.

The residents groups supporting the challenge include all four neighbouring groups: Friends of Turnham Green, Chiswick High Road Action Group, West Chiswick and Gunnersbury Society and Acton Green Residents’ Association.

The challenge is based on the following:

- Height of buildings – Local policies are against tall buildings in this area and there is a long standing aspiration to get rid of Empire House.

- Employment – The local plan site designation for this site provided for mainly continued employment uses such as offices or hotel space.

- Heritage - The proposed development will cause irreparable harm to the Turnham Green Conservation area.

- Housing - The development seeks to get round Hounslow’s policies on affordable housing by claiming the right to develop Empire House with no affordable housing contribution and the remainder of the site with only a fraction of the 41% affordable housing target. The result is just 11% affordable housing. All this is based on claims as to viability of the project based on calculations that have not been disclosed.

- Consultation – Officers recommended approval of this development despite strong opposition from the overwhelming majority of respondents to consultation. There were comprehensive objections from residents, residents’ groups and Sainsbury’s who own the adjoining superstore and car park together with British Land. These were ignored. In a final blow, the Council refused to allow time to examine and respond to a substantial amount of important documentation put in at the last minute, well after the consultation period was over.


September 5, 2015