THE CHISWICKW4.COM CHATT SESSION

New leader John Chatt

The Leader of Hounslow Council, Councillor John Chatt has kindly agreed to answer a series of Chiswick related questions from local residents. The response to this was massive and for reasons of space many questions are an amalgamation of queries from different individuals. Thank you to every one who sent in questions and apologies if your subject was not addressed.

1. Does Councillor Chatt feel that it is fair that Chiswick pays higher parking charges than the rest of the borough?

2. What is the Council doing to secure sustainable and sympathetic regeneration of West Chiswick?

3. Has there being a softening of Hounslow Council's line on the expansion of Heathrow and would a Third Runway ever be acceptable to the current administration?

4. What plans has the Council to help St. Mary's Convent Nursing Home stave off closure?

5. Do you feel that the handling of the changes at Chiswick Lane junction devalued any sense of a community's right to decide issues of importance to itself?

6. Are you alarmed that Chiswick is one of the few places in London which is seeing worsening air pollution, and would you accept that this could be partly due to the policy of discouraging the flow of car traffic in favour of buses?

7. Will the Council proceed with the current plans for the library despite the objections of the Friends of Chiswick Library?

8. Can Cllr Chatt confirm how much money is available through s106 as a result of the development of Chiswick Park, whether it is accruing interest and what he would like to see it spent on?

9. Do you share the concerns of some people that the Grove Park School case is an early indication that in the next few years Chiswick will have more children than available primary school places?

10. When is the last time that you visited Dukes Meadows? Do you feel this area reflects well on the Council's/CIP's ability to maintain open spaces?

11. What lobbying is the Council currently doing to persuade London Underground to stop at Turnham Green?

12. How do you reassure Chiswick residents that their views will be adequately represented on an Executive on which no members are from local wards or even live or work in this area?

13. Will we have Christmas lights in Chiswick this year?

14. When will the underside of the railway bridge on Turnham Green Terrace be cleaned?

1. Does Councillor Chatt feel that it is fair that Chiswick pays higher parking charges than the rest of the borough?

I am aware that there are concerns about the different charges for residents parking in different parts of the borough. One of the reasons is that different parts of the Borough clearly have different characteristics. In the east of the Hounslow, parking demand is extremely high with only limited on and off-street provision. Generally the pressure on parking decreases further westwards in the Borough. Public transport accessibility also is generally better in the east of the Borough and poorer in the west, for example there are more buses to Central London, and neighbouring areas.

For these reasons, the Council has agreed that differential charges are maintained in the Borough with higher charges in the east and lower charges in the west. However when the charges were reviewed in April 1999, the Council raised the charge in the west of the Borough but agreed that the charges in the east should remain unchanged for a period of 2 years. In the review of charges implemented last year, the permit prices in the Chiswick area were reduced by £5 with other charges remaining unchanged and there are regular reviews of charges.

Also, the £70 charge for Chiswick works out as £1.35/week to be able to park close to your property, one of the reasons that so many people are in favour of CPZs when schemes are proposed. In other parts of the Borough, funds have been available to meet the full costs of establishing parking schemes. However, in the Chiswick area, there have only been limited funds available to establish the parking schemes that have been set up in East Chiswick, Bedford Park, Mid-Chiswick and Central Chiswick. The schemes have therefore been reliant on the income from permits and other charges to cover the balance of implementation costs.

Back to top

2. What is the Council doing to secure sustainable and sympathetic regeneration of West Chiswick?

There are two issues I need to address in response to this question; the UDP of the Council and the future plans for the West Chiswick Area.

In terms of UDP, the Council has to give equal consideration to social, economic and environmental issues in all decision making whilst minimising adverse impacts. Much of the UDP relates to the use of brownfield land for new developments, and to encourage a pattern of land use that utilises current facilities, including the provision of transport, which minimises the harm to the environment.

In West Chiswick this explains the reasoning behind the approval of the 'son-of-citadel' development.

Planning permission was refused recently for redevelopment of the John Bull site for office development, because, I understand amongst other things, of the loss of a building of Local Townscape Character and unsympathetic scale of development. This shows that our Planning Committees are taking note of local opinion.

Also, the high rise Chiswick West development is, I understand, still being considered following extensive consultation with local residents. For the planning officers and Councillors on the Chiswick Planning Committee, and the Sustainable Development Committee, the response from local residents is very valuable and the concerns expressed by residents are fully recognised.

However the Chiswick West applicant has been advised that the proposals clearly depart from policies in the Council's Unitary Development Plan. It would only be possible to consider granting planning permission if it can be demonstrated that there are exceptional circumstances that would justify any departure from the Council's adopted policies. However I am not aware of any exceptional circumstances that would warrant approval, though I am not on the Planning Committee.

For the future, the Council is proposing to designate much of West Chiswick as a Conservation Area as part of an urban design/Conservation regeneration strategy for Chiswick, subject to the outcome of public consultation. It could be that the designation could place early in 2003.

Back to top

3. Has there being a softening of Hounslow Council's line on the expansion of Heathrow and would a Third Runway ever be acceptable to the current administration?

No, not at all. There has been no change of policy regarding the borough's position on any proposed third runway at Heathrow. We are against it.

Though there hasn't been any application to build a third runway, I have taken advice from Officers about the possibility. They suggest that expansion of this nature is not sustainable.

The reasons for this are clear:

" A new runway could add 230,000 aircraft movement and 30 million passengers per annum, putting an incredible extra strain on current transport links.

" Air quality levels currently unacceptable and additional passenger throughput in relation to T5 is likely to make situation worse. Future runway would make this even worse.
It is well known that I worked at Heathrow, but that doesn't mean that I agreed with all of BAA's proposals. As a trade union representative and negotiator I often challenged them on many issues. Likewise as a West Area Councillor many of my constituents work at Heathrow, but that doesn't mean that they would favour a third runway.

Back to top

4. What plans has the Council to help St. Mary's Convent Nursing Home stave off closure?

Whilst we can understand the problems that St Mary's is having we are unable to get involved financially, especially as we ourselves must conform to new rules in this area. I have seen and heard about the fund-raising initiatives for St Mary's and I am very impressed with the community effort to help raise the vast amount needed.

However, I know St Mary's well after working with them on a number of building and planning issues in the past, both as Mayor in 1990 and Leader, and I have followed the activities of the home since. Once when I visited St Mary's I was told the many of the nuns were older than their residents and that this could be a future problem, however the current issue of altering buildings to follow new guidelines is one that is ultimately more important, and more of a threat to the Home's future. I wish St Mary's every success in raising the desired funds.

Back to top

5. Do you feel that the handling of the changes at Chiswick Lane junction devalued any sense of a community's right to decide issues of importance to itself?

Well, firstly I must apologise for the unacceptable delay in the completion of the CLJ works, which was partly due to a failure on our part to manage the project as well as we could.

However I think that the question is looking at issues on a much bigger scale than one junction, and at the issue of local decision making in general.

Hounslow was one of the first Councils to introduce local area committees, and to change the way decisions were made on a local level, in order to reflect the increasing importance of resident involvement in the process. Since the May elections our local area committees have yet more powers, especially in relation to S106 allocations, and the feedback from the last Chiswick Area Committee is that Chiswick Councillors have already influenced S106 for education in Chiswick.

However, in some cases, other issues and policies need to be taken into account, especially if a decision affects more than just the local population. In the case of the Chiswick Lane Junction it was the Mayor's plans to improve bus services to and from central London. There are often bigger issues to be addressed by local committees, not just in Chiswick but also in our other areas, including the west area where I am a councillor, that do mean that local opinion needs to be balanced. Fortunately they don't come up too often but they always seem to be major issues when they do.

Back to top


6. Are you alarmed that Chiswick is one of the few places in London which is seeing worsening air pollution, and would you accept that this could be partly due to the policy of discouraging the flow of car traffic in favour of buses?

Yes, I am alarmed, and the information I have shows that air quality across London was generally worse in 2001 than 2000, especially in Camden, Kensington and Chelsea and Hounslow sites.

I know all motor vehicles emit pollution but that emitted from buses is rapidly declining as technological improvements are made and the new bus fleet is introduced. We must strive to reduce pollution from all sources but effective use of public transport, and especially buses, is a key, not only in relation to pollution but also in the reduction of congestion.

We do monitor air pollution, as you can see from the monitoring station on the High Road, and there are known hot spots that we keep an eye on.

Back to top

7. Will the Council proceed with the current plans for the library despite the objections of the Friends of Chiswick Library?

No - the Council will not be proceeding with the current plans for Chiswick library, primarily because they haven't addressed all of the issues that have been raised. The proposals have been taken back to the drawing board and they will have to be represented at the Chiswick Area Committee. I know that Chiswick Library is one of the busiest in the borough, yet it is unsuitable at the moment for local needs, especially with government guidelines relating to computer and internet facilities. We must be sure that all the issues are looked at, and addressed locally, before proceeding.

Back to top

8. Can Cllr Chatt confirm how much money is available through s106 as a result of the development of Chiswick Park, whether it is accruing interest and what he would like to see it spent on?

At the present time I cannot. I am informed that the Deed of Variation is still being negotiated, and that the amounts of S106 money available will not be disclosed until the Deed has been signed. A full update is scheduled to go to Chiswick Area Committee and I would not want to bypass the procedure in this case. The local area committee is the place for this information to be reported.

Back to top

9. Do you share the concerns of some people that the Grove Park School case is an early indication that in the next few years Chiswick will have more children than available primary school places?

I think that the Grove Park school case actually strengthens and increases the available school places for local children, by re-emphasising the importance of community schools for local communities, and by putting local children first for admission to their local school.
The LEA puts together a School Organisation Plan every year which looks, amongst other things, at the projected demand for school places. This helps schools and the Council to plan accordingly. It is not anticipated that demand in the Borough will exceed the number of places available.

Also, the William Hogarth School will be expanding over the next 4 years into a full Primary school, increasing places locally.

Back to top

10. When is the last time that you visited Dukes Meadows? Do you feel this area reflects well on the Council's/CIP's ability to maintain open spaces?

I'm actually at Dukes Meadows quite often as I am a member of the Civil Service Bowls Club, and I was last there on Sunday. I am also a regular visitor to the bandstand and river areas, as well as the allotments as I am very interested in the allotments. This is one of the best allotment sites. Of course I have also been to the Farmers' Market.

I was invited to the Duke of Devonshire's visit, at which we discussed the area, and I also have close contact with the Friends of Dukes Meadows and I keep updated on their developments. Their work is invaluable and very much appreciated locally.

Back to top

11. What lobbying is the Council currently doing to persuade London Underground to stop at Turnham Green?

We are currently not lobbying for the Piccadilly Line to stop at Turnham Green. Although it is part of the current Transport Strategy I think that there would be little to gain until the Tube has been transferred to the Mayor for London. I don't think it would be a wise use of what are scarce staff resources to lobby at the moment. However when the transfer has happened we will be working with, and for, local residents and groups to resume lobby strongly. I understand the Mayor has already made some comment about the need to review when he gets it within his control, which is welcome news.

Back to top

12. How do you reassure Chiswick residents that their views will be adequately represented on an Executive on which no members are from local wards or even live or work in this area?

Well, there is a good argument here for me saying that you voted in the wrong party, but I would say that wouldn't I!

In all seriousness though, the fact that 9 Conservative Councillors represent Chiswick shouldn't, and doesn't, stop cross party links and procedures - and I do have an open door to all borough councillors, regardless of party.

To illustrate this, we have been working closely with Luke Kirton, of the AbeeC party, on the urgent issues of Brentford Football Ground and we have recently been able to announce some progress.

Also, the executive works for the whole borough regardless of the ward we represent, and we try to keep abreast of local issues as much as possible.

Back to top

13. Will we have Christmas lights in Chiswick this year?

That all depends on the willingness or ability for the local area committee and local traders to put funds forward for Christmas lights, in the same way as the other areas in Hounslow do. In Hounslow centre the area committee put money into a scheme for Diwali and Christmas.

I have also had some initial discussions with an advertising organisation who suggested that they could put lights on Chiswick High Road, as part of a project across the borough. There could be other ways to fund lights and these are being explored.

Back to top

14. When will the underside of the railway bridge on Turnham Green Terrace be cleaned?

Last year, Wandsworth Council won an important case against Railtrack, resulting in Railtrack being ordered to pay for the removal of pigeon fouling beneath a bridge in Wandsworth, and pay for the erection of netting to the bridge to prevent further pigeon activity. This was an important result for us because both Railtrack and London Underground Ltd had consistently denied that they are responsible for such problems on bridges, and that local authorities are responsible..

However, I understand that the ruling appears to have been dependent upon the scale of the problem and the cost of the remedial works for the one particular bridge in question (in Balham), both of which are far and above that found on the bridge at Turnham Green Terrace. Our legal department and written to LU twice since the outcome of the court case but have not yet received a reply, but we will continue to follow this issue up with LU and Railtrack, or their successor.

In the past the underside of the bridge has been "proofed" against pigeons but I believe that, in one or two areas, this proofing has failed or been removed. As a result there is some fouling beneath the bridge but not a level sufficient to warrant expensive formal action against London Underground, which might fail due to the amounts concerned.

We will continue to lobby London Underground to improve the conditions under the bridge and I have asked our Street Cleansing service to ensure that they clean the pavements beneath the bridge regularly.

Back to top

Hounslow Council Leader Steps Down

See the local government section of the site for details of the election results and comments.